Should Christians Pay Tax?

Yes, we should. But why? And what about when our taxes go towards things that aren’t right?

“Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God… For because of this you also pay taxes, for the authorities are ministers of God, attending to this very thing. Pay to all what is owed to them: taxes to whom taxes are owed, revenue to whom revenue is owed, respect to whom respect is owed, honor to whom honor is owed.”

Romans 13:1, 6-7 (ESV)

I think most of us would agree that paying taxes is right for a Christian. After all, it’s outlined pretty clearly here. God establishes government to keep law and order. We obey him in paying taxes. We should not do this begrudgingly. We should see it as our due to the institution God has given to serve us and keep us safe.

Paul goes further by saying we should honor and respect our leaders, not merely tolerate them. This can be hard in our current age of partisan hatred and vitriol, but it’s our job as Christians to be different from the world. Resist the temptation to fall in line with how everyone else is acting.

“Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”

Romans 12:2 (ESV)

Jesus offers us another angle on paying taxes when the Pharisees challenge him.

“‘Tell us, then, what you think. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?’ But Jesus, aware of their malice, said, ‘Why put me to the test, you hypocrites? Show me the coin for the tax.’ And they brought him a denarius. And Jesus said to them, ‘Whose likeness and inscription is this?’ They said, ‘Caesar’s.’ Then he said to them, ‘Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.'”

Matthew 22:17-21 (ESV)

Jesus confirms Paul’s words (perhaps the other way around), but as usual, he goes even further. Have you ever stopped and really thought about that phrase before? “…to God the things that are God’s.” That’s the real kicker. Not only should we offer up our taxes to the government, but we should offer up ourselves to God. He rightfully purchased us on the cross. We owe him our time, our money, and our lives. That’s a tall order.

“Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.”

1 Corinthians 6:19-20 (ESV)

“I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship.”

Romans 12:1-2 (ESV)

It is a far higher and more difficult calling to give God the things that are God’s than to give Caesar the things that are Caesar’s. Yet the Pharisees saw it the other way around. They were shocked Jesus would support this tax. They hated their government, and for good reason. This brings us to another point. Should Christians pay taxes to corrupt governments committing evil acts?

“If Christians can support Rome, what government could they not support? This is the government that killed Christ and almost all the apostles. And here Jesus is telling them, pay for it. Pay that tax that is going to pay the salary of the very men who are about to drive the nails into My hands, not because what they are doing is right, but because government reflects the character of God. God will deal with them.”1

Mark Dever

The key principle here is not about where your money eventually goes, but about respecting the role of government as God has laid it out. Our role is obedience. It’s not ultimately up to the church to keep authorities accountable. It’s up to God.

Does this mean we should never try to improve our government or work to prevent evil from being committed with our tax dollars? No. There’s absolutely a time and a place for making a positive difference, especially in America where we have the privilege to participate in our government. Some of us are called to be godly missionaries, some to be godly office workers, and others to be godly civil servants. My goal is not to dissuade anyone from upholding justice or acting according to their convictions. My goal is to make it undeniably clear that Jesus instructed his followers to pay a tax to their tyrannical ruler and to give themselves up to their glorious Creator.

Let me know your thoughts about taxes in the comments below. Enter your email if you want to be notified when my next post goes live. Thanks for reading. Godspeed.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
  1. Mark Dever, God and Politics: Jesus’ Vision for Society, State and Government (Leyland, England: 10Publishing, 2016), 27.

The Fundamental Difference Between Socialism and Capitalism

Two topics that rarely seem to collide nowadays are religion and economics. It seems Christians are content to separate “church life” from the world we live in every day. We may receive God’s Word on Sunday, but we receive whatever the world is feeding us the rest of the week. It’s all too easy to believe the TV and fall into whatever worldview fits our friend group the best.

But why do we do this? Why is it that so many Christians are content to view the world through the lens of the world rather than the lens of the Bible? I say we ought to apply God’s truth to all aspects of our lives and allow it to shape our worldview accordingly. Today, we’ll attempt to do exactly that regarding an important part of the conversation on macroeconomics.

“Thus says the Lord: ‘Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the Lord.’ The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick; who can understand it?”

Jeremiah 17:5, 9 (ESV)

The Problem of Evil

Everyone knows about the problem of evil, and I’m not speaking lightly. Literally everyone knows about the problem of evil. We’re surrounded by it every day. It’s in our very bones, slowly rotting us to death and aching beneath our skin. We know something is wrong. We know we aren’t what we should be. We know the world isn’t what it should be. We see it in war. We see it in homelessness and starvation. We see it in the greed and lust of humanity for money and power. We see it in the hatred between people groups. We see it in the abuse between a husband and a wife. We see it in ourselves in our selfishness, our carelessness, and our anger. What can be done about it?

Now, I don’t plan to answer that question today. It’d take a bit more time than either of us planned, I wager. Instead, let’s take this premise and apply it to another topic. What does the problem of evil mean for economics? That’s still a large question, but the idea is that it does matter. Evil affects every aspect of our lives. Surely it’s important when talking about our economy as well.

Capitalism & Socialism

Let’s take two economic systems and look at how they deal with the problem of evil. Note that I’m speaking very broadly here. This isn’t an economics class and I’m not an expert. This is philosophy class and your teacher needs to make a point.

Capitalism is known for greatly rewarding those who are ambitious and able to sell products or services to the masses. It also does a decent job of creating a fruitful society for those who just want to work for those people and take home a paycheck. It isn’t very favorable to those who are inactive in the market, as it’s centered on capital and trade between private parties. As such, the unemployed, broke, or disadvantaged can fall behind. The government usually focuses on enforcing law and order, fighting off outside threats, and maintaining things like currency, roads, and market competition. It’s historically the most successful economic system in the world. It promotes growth of economy and wealth of all citizens, though it does skew over time towards the rich and those with the most dominance in the market. We usually see it supplemented with social programs such as welfare and public services. Common criticisms include lack of care for the lower class, unfettered corporate greed, and unchecked profit motive leading to the abuse of the working class.

Socialism is known for taking power away from private parties and placing it in the hands of the government, though most realized forms of it utilize a pseudo-free market to a large extent. The government is generally in charge of the means of production and uses high taxes in order to provide goods and services to all members of society. It’s common to work for companies that are either integrated with the government or part of the government. This system rewards those who are in power in the government and attempts to treat everyone else as equals. This discourages ambition, but allows for the government to support the unemployed, broke, or disadvantaged with the money they make taxing the general populace. Sometimes the government uses its power and money to pursue social causes such as progressivism, feminism, or environmentalism. I think it’s safe to say this economic system has seen its fair share of historical failures, while also producing some successful outcomes when combined with a healthy dose of the free market, not to mention international support. Common criticisms include lack of motivation to innovate and produce wealth, unfettered corruption of the state, and unchecked wealth mismanagement leading to crashing economies and worthless currencies.

The Difference

The fundamental difference between capitalism and socialism is that socialism assumes man is basically good, while capitalism assumes man is basically evil. Only one of these is supported in the Bible.

Capitalism exploits the natural selfish desire to succeed and build wealth. It does this by allowing a free market to determine what rises to the top. Only the best (and most crafty) survive. It’s a terrifying, yet brilliant concept. Take the people who tend towards selfish ambition and put them to work for society by allowing them the space to work as hard as they want on whatever motivates them. Their success is determined by what the general populace wants. This usually leads to amazing leaps in technology and luxury. Just look at the rise of the smartphone. The only reason we have this tech today is because Apple decided to take the concept of a touchscreen phone and make it simple and marketable to everyday people. Their success in creating an appealing product led to a staple of modern life. Capitalism is effective at delivering new and exciting things while making the people behind them very rich. The two balances to this system are the market and the government. If a company does something reprehensible, they can be boycotted by the people or punished by the government. This keeps selfish ambition in check to some extent.

Socialism does not take this natural selfish desire into account. In fact, it willfully ignores it in favor of wishful thinking. Instead of creating a space for fierce competition to check itself, it tries its best to eliminate the chase for wealth by controlling the means of production for various industries, imposing high taxes on successful people, and eliminating some of the downsides of being lower class. The end result is that the most ambitious and successful people are active in the government (if they haven’t left for a capitalist country already). When you remove the profit motive, the only thing left to grasp is power. You see, socialism assumes that the state knows what’s best for the people. The state will provide for their needs. The state will restrict what is harmful. Thus, the state is given all the power. But this assumes the state is not corrupt. What is a government except a collection of people running a country? People are fallible and selfish. They will eventually turn to their own interests.

In capitalism, selfishness only works as long as you provide value to society. You will be abandoned and your profits reduced if you become unpopular with the masses. This cannot happen to a government because there’s nobody to compete with. There are no checks or balances. The government can hold a gun to your head and tell you to shut your mouth and get in line. They can take as much of your money as they want and use it to do whatever they want. The general populace has no say. It takes a coup or violent revolution to undo the effects of a tyrannical government. We’ve seen it happen time and time again throughout history. I think it’s safe to say market upsets are preferable to bloodshed and anarchy, but maybe that’s just me.

This is also the fundamental reason why government programs and services are usually stagnant, inefficient, and generally awful. Without a profit motive, there’s no reason to improve wait times at the DMV. There’s no reason for the USPS to stay out of debt. There’s no reason to fix the potholes all over Michigan. The government gets your money whether they use it to help you or not. This means they usually spend enough to keep you quiet, then take the rest for their own interests. Private companies only get your money when they’re actively creating value. They’re motivated to improve because competition is fierce and there’s profit up for grabs. This is why I lean libertarian when it comes to privatization of industry. Greedy businessmen always do better work than the government.

Now, you might say I’m being unfair here. Not every socialist state ends up in ruin. Not every capitalist society checks itself very well. That’s true. But the trends are unmistakable. Socialist countries that display success are inevitably using the free market in some fashion. They have to allow some aspects of capitalism in order to function properly. They’re usually smaller countries relying on outside help in regards to military power and innovation. Capitalist countries can struggle to keep corrupt businessmen in line, but this frequently goes hand in hand with government influence and corruption via subsidies, loopholes, and bribes. Keep the government smaller and you have less of these problems, though any government attracts corruption.

No matter what system of economics you use, society will never evolve into utopia. Both capitalism and socialism have major issues. My goal here isn’t to argue that capitalism is perfect. Only that it does a better job of taking selfish motives into account and harnessing them for the betterment of society rather than tyranny.

Man is Basically Evil

Let’s finish by taking a look at what the Bible has to say regarding evil.

“God looks down from heaven on the children of man to see if there are any who understand, who seek after God. They have all fallen away; together they have become corrupt; there is none who does good, not even one.”

Psalm 53:2-3 (ESV)

There are no exceptions. All of humanity is evil. If you ascribe to the Bible, this point cannot be argued. But what is evil? This verse gives us a clue by identifying those who do not understand and do not seek after God. What does this mean? We are all naturally inclined away from God. We don’t care to understand the mysteries of his nature. We seek to understand the world and how we can best exploit it for our personal gain. We see this in economics and we see it in our private sins.

“For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”

Romans 3:22b-23 (ESV)

Sin is how we demonstrate our evil. We actively oppose God in our actions of selfishness and hatred. This is what condemns us. Even something as “innocent” as hurling an angry insult is out of alignment with God and is enough to justify damnation. Jesus makes this clear.

“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.”

Matthew 5:21-22 (ESV)

This was, no doubt, a shock to many of the practicing Jews in Jesus’ day. They followed the letter of the law, seeking to live a life technically meeting all the requirements to be in good standing with God. What they missed was the heart motive. Hatred may not produce the same earthly effects as murder, but it is equally as evil.

“For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it.”

James 2:10 (ESV)

This might seem harsh, but it’s only right and just when we’re talking about a perfect and holy God. We have no right to stand on equal footing with our Creator, for we have all rejected him. Where does that leave us?

The Solution

“The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.”

Psalm 118:22 (ESV)

As Jesus makes clear in Matthew 21, this verse is a prophecy referring to him. We have all rejected Christ, but he has become the cornerstone, the foundation, the rock. This thread is woven throughout the Bible. You can read more about it in 1 Peter 2. What it boils down to is that Jesus is our only salvation. We can only hope to find redemption through him. Rather than deny or ignore our sin, we ought to acknowledge it, repent from it, and throw ourselves at the feet of the Lord. He promises to make us whole.

“If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

1 John 1:8-9 (ESV)

“For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

Romans 6:23 (ESV)

Leave a comment if you have thoughts about the nature of evil as it relates to economics. Enter your email below if you want to be notified when my next post goes live. Thanks for reading. Godspeed.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Could automation and wealth redistribution replace the 40-hour work week?

No. The answer is no. Let’s talk about that.

Last week, we discussed inflation and productivity in the workplace. Click here to read that post. Today, we’re continuing a series on the anti-work movement by talking about automation and wealth redistribution.

Automation

Something I’ve seen pop up time and time again in the anti-work community is the idea that automation is reducing the number of jobs, and that we might be able to automate pretty much everything at some point. This would free up a lot of people who were previously needed in the workforce, potentially leading to a society where people don’t have to work at all if they don’t want to. As you can probably tell, this train of logic is about as solid as paper mache. Let’s break it down.

The first point to tackle is automation. There are thousands of examples to draw on, but one that comes to mind is the lamplighter. We no longer need someone to go around town and light the lamps at the appropriate time each day. We now have an electrical grid that powers lights throughout our cities automatically. Does this mean we’ve eliminated the need for labor? You might say yes, at first. When the lights turn on, everything works and nobody needs to do anything, right? Wrong. Electric lights are machines. They break down and need repairing sometimes. They need power from a source in order to function. How is this done? With repairmen, electricians, and city leaders using taxpayer money to ensure local power plants are operational and feeding power to all the lamps at the right times. There are thousands of hardworking humans behind all of that infrastructure. By automating street lights, we haven’t removed labor at all. We’ve only shifted it into a more manageable and convenient form.

The Math Doesn’t Add Up

This brings to mind the first law of thermodynamics, which teaches us that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Much like energy, labor cannot be removed from a functional society, at least not without consequences. To remove labor removes the results of that labor. To replace the labor of a lamplighter with a fraction of labor across hundreds of engineers, maintenance workers, and politicians is not the same as removing it.

Therefore, the best automation can do is help us be more efficient with our labor. The industrial revolution has played a huge part in this. Instead of planting seed by hand, we use machines to do it very rapidly, for example. But this does not point to a future where our labor will be so efficient that it will disappear altogether. If anything, it reveals that our nation has grown rich and prosperous as a result of capitalism. After all, it takes many hours of difficult labor to create the machines that assemble the farm equipment that we use to plant seed. It also takes a lot of labor and valuable resources to fuel and maintain these machines. How on earth do we manage to pay for all of it? With our immense wealth, of course.

The Riches of Capitalism

One thing capitalism does very well is reward ingenuity with cold hard cash. Regardless of your opinion on trickle-down economics, the reality is that capitalism does lead to more prosperous nations overall. But that’s a topic for another post. My point is that the road to automation is paved with the gold of businessmen. Yet these are precisely the people the anti-work community wants to steal from in order to fund their utopia. They’re obsessed with revolting against the evil bourgeoisie and letting the government take care of everyone “equally” using their wealth. But is that feasible?

Surely, we don’t need the rich hoarding all their money away from us. If only we could take it from them and give it to the masses. We could live for a while on that, right? Well, that’s what the anti-work community seems to think. Let’s take a look at the numbers. Right now, the combined net worth of all American billionaires is about $5 trillion as of October 18, 2021.1 If we liquidate and divide this money equally among every U.S. household (roughly 128 million), how much would each household receive? The answer is just under $40k, assuming it’s tax-free. This allows all of America to live modestly for a year or so. After that, the money is gone. And remember, we liquidated the net worth of all our billionaires to get that money. This means all companies, products, jobs, investments, and innovations they’re responsible for are gone. In the act of giving everyone a year off work, we would cripple our economy. It’s not realistic, feasible, or ethical on any level.

Conclusion

The anti-work community seems intent on taking full advantage of the automation afforded to them by capitalism while rejecting the system entirely and feeding all wealth into a common pool for everyone. They believe that this will lead to a society where wealth is distributed equally, everyone can have a modest standard of living, and the vast majority of jobs are automated by machines and robots. They think the future is sipping tea on their porch playing board games with their buddies, writing blog posts in the evenings, and sucking the government teat to pay their bills and buy groceries delivered by self-driving cars.

The reality is that wealth redistribution doesn’t work long-term, automation doesn’t eliminate the need for labor, and removing all incentive to work or create value for society will, as a matter of fact, reduce the jobs being done and the value being created in our society, leading to our standard of living plummeting into the far reaches of the earth.

Next week, we’ll be taking a step back and looking at what the real underlying reason might be for the anti-work movement’s recent popularity. Enter your email below if you want to be notified when that goes live. Thanks for reading. Godspeed.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
  1. Chuck Collins, “Updates: Billionaire Wealth, U.S. Job Losses and Pandemic Profiteers,” Inequality.org, Institute for Policy Studies, October 18, 2021, https://inequality.org/great-divide/updates-billionaire-pandemic/.